England's 17th Century Revolution (article): Difference between revisions

From Leftypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎External links: clean up)
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"England's 17th Century Revolution"''' is an 1850 review by [[Karl Marx]] of [[François Guizot]]'s pamphlet "Why Did the English Revolution Succeed?" (Fr: ''"Pourquoi la révolution d'Angleterre a-t-elle réussi?"'') of the same year. Guizot had been a professor of [[history]] before he entered politics,<ref>{{cite web | title=François Guizot | website=Encyclopedia Britannica | date=1999-05-04 | url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Francois-Guizot | ref={{sfnref | Encyclopedia Britannica | 1999}} | access-date=2023-05-13}}</ref> eventually becoming prime minister of the unstable [[July Revolution|July Monarchy]] in 1847. Five months into his term, Guizot and his government were overthrown in the [[Revolutions of 1848|February Revolution]], and he returned to the field of history to defend his [[monarchist]] outlook. In his 1850 pamphlet, he blames the French "character" for the tumult of the past half-century, arguing that the monarchist-[[liberal]] compromise of the July Government ought to have met the same success as the [[English]] constitutional monarchy and drawing unfavorable comparisons between the anti-monarchist [[French Revolution]] of 1789 with the English "[[Glorious Revolution]]" a century before.{{cn|reason=Can we get the actual source text?}} Marx, in his response, accuses Guizot of only explaining events by way of [[idealist]] "political phrases" rather than focusing on the vast differences in the course of English and French [[economics|economic]] development. His refutation of Guizot's arguments is presented through a brief summary of his own [[historical materialist]] analysis, which outlines the concept he would later term "[[bourgeois revolution]]". The resulting brief text has value for [[Marxist]]s mainly because of its concrete take on events that had preceded Marx's lifetime—a small ''corpus'' when compared to his political and economic body of work.
'''"England's 17th Century Revolution"''' is an 1850 review by [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]{{cn}} of [[François Guizot]]'s pamphlet "Why Did the English Revolution Succeed?" (Fr: ''"Pourquoi la révolution d'Angleterre a-t-elle réussi?"'') of the same year. Guizot had been a professor of [[history]] before he entered politics,<ref>{{cite web | title=François Guizot | website=Encyclopedia Britannica | date=1999-05-04 | url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Francois-Guizot | ref={{sfnref | Encyclopedia Britannica | 1999}} | access-date=2023-05-13}}</ref> eventually becoming prime minister of the unstable [[July Revolution|July Monarchy]] in 1847. Five months into his term, Guizot and his government were overthrown in the [[Revolutions of 1848|February Revolution]], and he returned to the field of history to defend his [[monarchist]] outlook. In his 1850 pamphlet, he blames the French "character" for the tumult of the past half-century, arguing that the monarchist-[[liberal]] compromise of the July Government ought to have met the same success as the [[English]] constitutional monarchy and drawing unfavorable comparisons between the anti-monarchist [[French Revolution]] of 1789 with the English "[[Glorious Revolution]]" a century before.{{cn|reason=Can we get the actual source text?}} Marx, in his response, accuses Guizot of only explaining events by way of [[idealist]] "political phrases" rather than focusing on the vast differences in the course of English and French [[economics|economic]] development. His refutation of Guizot's arguments is presented through a brief summary of his own [[historical materialist]] analysis, which outlines the concept he would later term "[[bourgeois revolution]]". The resulting brief text has value for [[Marxist]]s mainly because of its concrete take on events that had preceded Marx's lifetime—a small ''corpus'' when compared to his political and economic body of work.
==Summary==
==Summary==
{{Empty section|date=May 2023}}
{{Empty section|date=May 2023}}
Line 12: Line 12:
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
==External links==
==External links==
* [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1850/02/english-revolution.htm England’s 17th Century Revolution] at Marxists.org{{Template:NavTMarxEng}}
* [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1850/02/english-revolution.htm England’s 17th Century Revolution] at Marxists.org
[[category:Texts by Marx]]
[[Category:Texts by Karl Marx]] [[category:texts by Friedrich Engels]]
 
{{Marx and Engels navbox|both-only}}
{{Marx and Engels navbox|marx}}

Latest revision as of 19:21, 15 March 2024

"England's 17th Century Revolution" is an 1850 review by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels[citation needed] of François Guizot's pamphlet "Why Did the English Revolution Succeed?" (Fr: "Pourquoi la révolution d'Angleterre a-t-elle réussi?") of the same year. Guizot had been a professor of history before he entered politics,[1] eventually becoming prime minister of the unstable July Monarchy in 1847. Five months into his term, Guizot and his government were overthrown in the February Revolution, and he returned to the field of history to defend his monarchist outlook. In his 1850 pamphlet, he blames the French "character" for the tumult of the past half-century, arguing that the monarchist-liberal compromise of the July Government ought to have met the same success as the English constitutional monarchy and drawing unfavorable comparisons between the anti-monarchist French Revolution of 1789 with the English "Glorious Revolution" a century before.[citation needed] Marx, in his response, accuses Guizot of only explaining events by way of idealist "political phrases" rather than focusing on the vast differences in the course of English and French economic development. His refutation of Guizot's arguments is presented through a brief summary of his own historical materialist analysis, which outlines the concept he would later term "bourgeois revolution". The resulting brief text has value for Marxists mainly because of its concrete take on events that had preceded Marx's lifetime—a small corpus when compared to his political and economic body of work.

Summary

Significance

See also

References

  1. "François Guizot". Encyclopedia Britannica. 1999-05-04. Retrieved 2023-05-13.

External links