Leftypedia:Articles for deletion

These are articles nominated for deletion. Keep in mind that Leftypedia, as a small site, does not have the same deletion criteria as other sites, such as Wikipedia.

"Discussions" simulated by Wisconcom in order to delete ProleWiki and InfraWiki pages

The user Wisconcom or SociusVenger used sock-puppet accounts in order to delete the ProleWiki and InfraWiki pages. This section is here for archival purposes.

ProleWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result of this discussion was delete. Topic lacks notability needed for inclusion in a separate article. Friendlyleninist1917 (talk) 04:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC) ProleWiki No reliable and independent sources are present on the article pertaining to this website (with all of the sources being from ProleWiki itself except for a single source which amounts to an unrelated forum post, of which is user-generated content and therefore unacceptable). A search for this website reveals that it is only mentioned externally by a few wikis, nothing more. The existing article itself is questionable at best in its tone and content. For instance, the sections "Administration" and "Relations with external forums and communities" are extremely self-promotional in tone, with it reading like an advertisement for this site's "book club" and Twitter account. Further, roughly 20% of this article is dedicated solely to attacking a single editor of that site without any actual sourcing (see section "Banning of Wisconcom (28 September 2022 – 23 October 2022)"), which, in addition to being inappropriate, also means that this article bears elements of an attack page. It must also be noted that this article was virtually edited in full by administrators of ProleWiki itself (namely Forte and CriticalResist, which clearly indicates that the current point of view of this article is one which is heavily biased towards ProleWiki). Because of these factors (along with others), I propose this articled be deleted. Friendlyleninist1917 (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Delete - a small wiki which practically only has stub articles and can hardly muster around 10 active users. I am not sure how this is meaningful to leftist politics. This website will probably be non-existent within a few years due to inactivity anyways. NeoStalinistCadre1976 (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

InfraWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. Subject of the article lacks notability. Friendlyleninist1917 (talk) 17:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC) InfraWiki A brief examination of this website indicates that this definitely should not exist as a separate article. No reliable sourcing at all can be found, with the existing sources linking to the site itself. I can't think of any reason why this article should be kept. InfraWiki is an insignificant far-right site which has not even been edited in weeks (and the only person who did regularly edit was the founder) and its existing content appears to be copy-and-pasted from either Conservapedia or ProleWiki, and its meager self-produced content is poorly written if not vulgar and self-promotional. Therefore, I propose it be deleted. Friendlyleninist1917 (talk) 21:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.<