Political spectrum: Difference between revisions

From Leftypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(commented out very simplistic old "radicalism and reaction" image. added new image showing french revolutionary origin of political spectrum. slight change of lede)
(Added section.)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Salle_du_manège_le_10_août_1792_enhance.png|thumb|310px|right|The National Assembly of the French Revolution is said to be the origin of the political spectrum.]]A political spectrum is a system of classifying different political positions upon one or more geometric axes that symbolize independent political dimensions. Most long-standing spectra include a right wing and left wing, which originally referred to seating arrangements in the National Assembly{{cn}} during the Revolutionary era (1789–99). The French parliament had the progressives and radicals seated on the Left and on the Right conservatives and reactionaries were seated.
[[File:Salle_du_manège_le_10_août_1792_enhance.png|thumb|310px|right|The National Assembly of the French Revolution is said to be the origin of the political spectrum.]]A '''political spectrum''' is a system of classifying different political positions upon one or more geometric axes that symbolize independent political dimensions. Most long-standing spectra include a right wing and left wing, which originally referred to seating arrangements in the National Assembly{{cn}} during the Revolutionary era (1789–99). The French parliament had the progressives and radicals seated on the Left and on the Right conservatives and reactionaries were seated.


== Variations ==
== Variations ==
Line 16: Line 16:


According to this spectrum, [[Communism|communism]] (being stateless) ought to be placed on the far-right and [[Fascism]] on the far-left.
According to this spectrum, [[Communism|communism]] (being stateless) ought to be placed on the far-right and [[Fascism]] on the far-left.
=== Political Compass ===
The political compass is, unlike the traditional linear spectrum, a two axis spectrum which commonly measures economic values as well as authoritarian or libertarian stances. One popular example of a political compass is [https://www.politicalcompass.org politicalcompass.org], a political test founded in 2001 which has a two axis model, one being the "social scale," which measures social attitudes as well as acceptance of "state-imposed collectivism," and the other being the "economic scale," which measures support for state-intervention and collectivization versus privatization and otherwise laissez-faire policies.<ref>[https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2 The Political Compass '''—''' Analysis] </ref>
According to this particular example of a political compass, [[Joseph Stalin]], [[Mao Zedong]], and [[Vladimir Lenin]] (i.e. [[Marxist–Leninist|Marxists–Leninists]] and other [[State socialism|state socialists]]) are considered "authoritarian left," [[Peter Kropotkin]], [[Rosa Luxembourg]], and [[Howie Hawkins]] (i.e. [[anarchists]] and other [[Libertarian socialism|libertarian socialists]]) are considered "libertarian left," [[Milton Friedman]] and [[Ron Paul]] (i.e. [[Right-libertarian|right-libertarians]]) are considered "libertarian right," and [[Marine Le Pen]], [[Donald Trump]], and [[Adolf Hitler]] are "authoritarian right."


===Radicalism and Reaction===
===Radicalism and Reaction===
<!--[[File:Radicalism and Reaction.jpg|frame|right]]-->
<!--[[File:Radicalism and Reaction.jpg|frame|right]]-->
Radicalism is currently employed to signify extremism. Historically, radicalism was inherently left-wing and the right-wing equivalent of radical was reactionary. This particular spectrum went 'radical - progressive - conservative - reactionary'.
Radicalism is currently employed to signify extremism. Historically, radicalism was inherently left-wing and the right-wing equivalent of radical was reactionary. This particular spectrum went 'radical - progressive - conservative - reactionary'.
== References ==
<references />
[[Category:Political science]]

Revision as of 22:04, 1 September 2023

The National Assembly of the French Revolution is said to be the origin of the political spectrum.

A political spectrum is a system of classifying different political positions upon one or more geometric axes that symbolize independent political dimensions. Most long-standing spectra include a right wing and left wing, which originally referred to seating arrangements in the National Assembly[citation needed] during the Revolutionary era (1789–99). The French parliament had the progressives and radicals seated on the Left and on the Right conservatives and reactionaries were seated.

Variations

Tim Cornelis' interpretation of the political spectrum intertwined with historical development. This spectrum is not universally accepted in Marxism.

Traditional linear spectrum

The traditional left-right linear spectrum can indicate various factors, or a combination of these. For instance, one common factor is social equality. The more social equality is pursued, the more to the left the political idea in question is said to be under this classification. Thus, anarchism and communism are placed on the far-left of the political spectrum while fascism, given its extreme social stratification, is placed on the far-right.

Horseshoe Spectrum

The horseshoe theory in political science asserts that rather than the far left and the far right being at opposite and opposing ends of a linear political continuum, they in fact closely resemble one another, much like the ends of a horseshoe. The theory is attributed to French writer Jean-Pierre Faye.

Under this classification, communism and fascism are put closer to each other than centrist political tendencies. This analysis, however, seems to ignore the basic qualities of both these political ideas. Communism is based on class struggle and proletarian internationalism and seeks to establish a classless, stateless society based on common ownership. In direct opposition, fascism is based on class collaboration and ultra-nationalism and seeks to establish a highly stratified society, totalitarian state, based on state and individual private ownership (although Jean-Pierre Faye was more concerned with where he considered the ideologies to be put in practice than in theory).

The One True Spectrum

The 'One True Spectrum' is a spectrum originating on the Internet from minarchist circles. It has no academic or theoretical underpinnings and is based on grave misconceptions about the nature of politics. The spectrum is biased in favour of minarchism and limited government construing it in such a way to make it appear the most sensible.

On the far-left there's autocracy or monarchy, which includes monarchism, Fascism, Communism, Socialism, and Nationalism. On the moderate left we find Corporatism (a misuse of the word corporatism, implying it is associated with Big Business). In the centre, the spectrum places democracy, which supposedly inherently leads to larger government. On the centre- or moderate right it places 'Republic' (based on a misuse of republic) based on rule of law and constitutionalism and limited government.

According to this spectrum, communism (being stateless) ought to be placed on the far-right and Fascism on the far-left.

Political Compass

The political compass is, unlike the traditional linear spectrum, a two axis spectrum which commonly measures economic values as well as authoritarian or libertarian stances. One popular example of a political compass is politicalcompass.org, a political test founded in 2001 which has a two axis model, one being the "social scale," which measures social attitudes as well as acceptance of "state-imposed collectivism," and the other being the "economic scale," which measures support for state-intervention and collectivization versus privatization and otherwise laissez-faire policies.[1]

According to this particular example of a political compass, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Vladimir Lenin (i.e. Marxists–Leninists and other state socialists) are considered "authoritarian left," Peter Kropotkin, Rosa Luxembourg, and Howie Hawkins (i.e. anarchists and other libertarian socialists) are considered "libertarian left," Milton Friedman and Ron Paul (i.e. right-libertarians) are considered "libertarian right," and Marine Le Pen, Donald Trump, and Adolf Hitler are "authoritarian right."

Radicalism and Reaction

Radicalism is currently employed to signify extremism. Historically, radicalism was inherently left-wing and the right-wing equivalent of radical was reactionary. This particular spectrum went 'radical - progressive - conservative - reactionary'.

References