Authoritarianism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SociusVenger (talk | contribs) m (Corrected certain details and reworded it to a "largely liberal concept" as some non-liberals subscribe to the concept as well. Removed "internet" category as this concept as a wider basis in political science beyond online politics.) |
Harrystein (talk | contribs) m (AWB genfixes/CE, typos fixed: especialy → especially; cleaning up WL) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Unreferenced|date=September 2023}} | {{Unreferenced|date=September 2023}} | ||
'''Authoritarianism''' is a largely [[liberal]] concept in [[political science]] used to describe governments which are said to lack certain elements of | '''Authoritarianism''' is a largely [[liberal]] concept in [[political science]] used to describe governments which are said to lack certain elements of liberal [[bourgeois democracy]], including [[political pluralism]], [[separation of powers]], [[republic]]anism, and [[political freedom]]s such as [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of assembly]]. | ||
It is notable that this label has also been applied to governments based on reports of authoritarian practices which later turn out to be false. In the 21st century, the ability of the Western liberal establishment to distinguish itself from illiberal forms of government has degenerated to such a point that liberal governments and [[media]] have resorted to a form of open cognitive dissonance, or ''"[[doublespeak]]"'', which uses contradicting labels. By the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. | It is notable that this label has also been applied to governments based on reports of authoritarian practices which later turn out to be false. In the 21st century, the ability of the Western liberal establishment to distinguish itself from illiberal forms of government has degenerated to such a point that liberal governments and [[media]] have resorted to a form of open cognitive dissonance, or ''"[[doublespeak]]"'', which uses contradicting labels. By the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Examples of contradictions in the concept of authoritarianism include: | Examples of contradictions in the concept of authoritarianism include: | ||
*[[Western]] political apparatuses, such as that of the [[United States]], use "freedom" and "authoritarianism" as two tools to reduce dissent, alternating between the two depending on which becomes necessary or convenient. | *[[Western]] political apparatuses, such as that of the [[United States]], use "freedom" and "authoritarianism" as two tools to reduce dissent, alternating between the two depending on which becomes necessary or convenient. | ||
*The forcible or extortive implementation of [[neoliberal]] policies, | *The forcible or extortive implementation of [[neoliberal]] policies, especially [[free-market]] reforms, [[austerity]], and [[privatization]]. For just a few examples, consider: | ||
:*The rule of [[Augusto Pinochet]] in [[Chile]]; | :*The rule of [[Augusto Pinochet]] in [[Chile]]; | ||
:*The un-[[democratic]] liberalizing policies of the US-backed [[Yeltsin]] government, which destroyed supply chains and led to the "authoritarian" [[Putin]] government; | :*The un-[[democratic]] liberalizing policies of the US-backed [[Yeltsin]] government, which destroyed supply chains and led to the "authoritarian" [[Putin]] government; | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 4 September 2023
 | This article does not cite any sources. (September 2023) |
Authoritarianism is a largely liberal concept in political science used to describe governments which are said to lack certain elements of liberal bourgeois democracy, including political pluralism, separation of powers, republicanism, and political freedoms such as freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.
It is notable that this label has also been applied to governments based on reports of authoritarian practices which later turn out to be false. In the 21st century, the ability of the Western liberal establishment to distinguish itself from illiberal forms of government has degenerated to such a point that liberal governments and media have resorted to a form of open cognitive dissonance, or "doublespeak", which uses contradicting labels. By the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting.
Criticism
A Marxist analysis could be considered contrary to the concept of "authoritarianism".
Examples of contradictions in the concept of authoritarianism include:
- Western political apparatuses, such as that of the United States, use "freedom" and "authoritarianism" as two tools to reduce dissent, alternating between the two depending on which becomes necessary or convenient.
- The forcible or extortive implementation of neoliberal policies, especially free-market reforms, austerity, and privatization. For just a few examples, consider:
- The rule of Augusto Pinochet in Chile;
- The un-democratic liberalizing policies of the US-backed Yeltsin government, which destroyed supply chains and led to the "authoritarian" Putin government;
- The US occupation and forcible neoliberalization of Iraq under Paul Bremer;
- The use of force, including coups, behind the policies of the IMF and World Bank as seen in countries like Venezuela and Bolivia, and throughout Africa.