2014 Ukrainian coup d'état: Difference between revisions

From Leftypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Cleanup|date=October 2023|reason=This article was created by a pro-Russia spammer.}}
{{quote|Now there is a lot of speculation, saying - "well, there were only few Nazis".... [Only a moron can say] such a thing.... If not for those 8% [of neo-Nazis] the effectiveness would have dropped by 90%.... If not for nationalists that whole thing would have turned into a gay parade.|Yevhen Karas|leader of neo-Nazi group S14 <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6bKivSjoAg</ref>}}


The Maidan Coup (aka The 2014 Ukrainian coup d'état or "Revolution of Dignity" by its supporters) was a violent US-backed anti-democratic colour revolution, While the Movement started with legitimate grievances such as corruption, abuse of power, human rights violations and the influence of oligarchs, The movement was quickly co-opted by the Far Right<ref>https://jacobin.com/2022/02/maidan-protests-neo-nazis-russia-nato-crimea?s=08</ref> and Western Nations who were upset with the democratically-elected President of Ukraine; Viktor Yanukovych for refusing to sign [[IMF]] loan. <ref>https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/what-do-the-world-bank-and-imf-have-to-do-with-the-ukraine-conflict</ref> These very grievances were intensified after the coup, with Racist 'Ukrainization', Authoritarian 'Lustration' and Totalitarian 'Decommunization' Laws contributing to mass authoritarianism and democratic backsliding in Ukraine, Russian Television and Opposition Parties were banned.<ref>https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26546083</ref><ref>https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2023/02/21/7390318/</ref>
The '''2014 Ukrainian coup d'état''' was a violent [[US]]-backed [[anti-democratic]] [[colour revolution]] which culminated the '''Euromaidan'''<!--Separate article?--> protests of 2013 and replaced the democratically elected government and existing constitution of Ukraine with a pro-[[EU]] interim government.


==Nuland-Pyatt Phone Call==
While the Euromaidan movement started with legitimate grievances such as corruption, abuse of power, human rights violations and the influence of oligarchs, the movement was quickly co-opted by the Ukrainian far-right<ref>https://jacobin.com/2022/02/maidan-protests-neo-nazis-russia-nato-crimea?s=08</ref> in concert with Western states opposed to president Viktor Yanukovych for his refusal to sign a $17 billion [[IMF]] loan. <ref>https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/what-do-the-world-bank-and-imf-have-to-do-with-the-ukraine-conflict</ref> These very grievances only worsened after the coup, with racist 'Ukrainization', [[authoritarian]] 'Lustration' and [[totalitarian]] [[decommunization]] laws contributing to mass authoritarianism and democratic backsliding in Ukraine. Russian television and opposition parties were banned.<ref>https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26546083</ref><ref>https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2023/02/21/7390318/</ref>


On February 6, an audio recording of the January 28 call between Nuland and Pyatt was leaked, On January 28, 2014, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine was on a phone call Geoffrey Pyatt discussed details of planned overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine. Nuland which opposition officials would make up the new regime, agreeing that Arseniy Yatsenyuk should be in charge. Nuland said 'Fuck the EU' when asked about if the EU would accept the new regime, despite the US claiming that Pro-Europeanism was the meaning of the Protests.  
==Nuland-Pyatt phone call==
{{unreferenced section}}
On February 6, an audio recording of a January 28 call between secretary of state [[Victoria Nuland]] and US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt was leaked in which the two bluntly discussed options for a replacement to the incumbent president. Nuland{{clarify}} which opposition officials would make up the new regime, agreeing that Arseniy Yatsenyuk should be in charge. Nuland, when asked if the EU would accept the new regime, said "fuck the EU." This was despite the US claiming that Pro-Europeanism was the meaning of the protests.{{clarify}}{{cn}}




On February 6, 2014, Nuland met with neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok and other oligarchs who assumed power after the coup. Tyahnybok leads the Neo-Nazi 'Svoboda' party. In 2004 Tyahnybok was kicked out of the ruling parliamentary faction after giving a speech calling for a fight against the "Muscovite-Jewish mafia." In 2005 Tyahnybok signed an open letter to Ukrainian leaders calling for the government to halt the "criminal activities" of "organized Jewry", which was supposedly spreading its influence through organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League to commit "genocide" against the Ukrainian people. <ref>https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-20824693</ref>
On February 6, 2014, Nuland met with neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok and other oligarchs who assumed power after the coup. Tyahnybok leads the Neo-Nazi 'Svoboda' party. In 2004 Tyahnybok was kicked out of the ruling parliamentary faction after giving a speech calling for a fight against the "Muscovite-Jewish mafia." In 2005 Tyahnybok signed an open letter to Ukrainian leaders calling for the government to halt the "criminal activities" of "organized Jewry", which was supposedly spreading its influence through organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League to commit "genocide" against the Ukrainian people. <ref>https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-20824693</ref>
 
==References==
<references />
<references />
{{stub}}

Latest revision as of 21:48, 4 November 2023

Now there is a lot of speculation, saying - "well, there were only few Nazis".... [Only a moron can say] such a thing.... If not for those 8% [of neo-Nazis] the effectiveness would have dropped by 90%.... If not for nationalists that whole thing would have turned into a gay parade.

— Yevhen Karas, leader of neo-Nazi group S14 [1]

The 2014 Ukrainian coup d'état was a violent US-backed anti-democratic colour revolution which culminated the Euromaidan protests of 2013 and replaced the democratically elected government and existing constitution of Ukraine with a pro-EU interim government.

While the Euromaidan movement started with legitimate grievances such as corruption, abuse of power, human rights violations and the influence of oligarchs, the movement was quickly co-opted by the Ukrainian far-right[2] in concert with Western states opposed to president Viktor Yanukovych for his refusal to sign a $17 billion IMF loan. [3] These very grievances only worsened after the coup, with racist 'Ukrainization', authoritarian 'Lustration' and totalitarian decommunization laws contributing to mass authoritarianism and democratic backsliding in Ukraine. Russian television and opposition parties were banned.[4][5]

Nuland-Pyatt phone call

On February 6, an audio recording of a January 28 call between secretary of state Victoria Nuland and US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt was leaked in which the two bluntly discussed options for a replacement to the incumbent president. Nuland[clarification needed] which opposition officials would make up the new regime, agreeing that Arseniy Yatsenyuk should be in charge. Nuland, when asked if the EU would accept the new regime, said "fuck the EU." This was despite the US claiming that Pro-Europeanism was the meaning of the protests.[clarification needed][citation needed]


On February 6, 2014, Nuland met with neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok and other oligarchs who assumed power after the coup. Tyahnybok leads the Neo-Nazi 'Svoboda' party. In 2004 Tyahnybok was kicked out of the ruling parliamentary faction after giving a speech calling for a fight against the "Muscovite-Jewish mafia." In 2005 Tyahnybok signed an open letter to Ukrainian leaders calling for the government to halt the "criminal activities" of "organized Jewry", which was supposedly spreading its influence through organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League to commit "genocide" against the Ukrainian people. [6]

References