Template:Academic-written review/doc

From Leftypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This template is based off the Academic Peer Reviewed template and is meant for Wikipedia articles updated as part of a dual publication model used by journals to incentivize scholarly contributions to Wikipedia. Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the Wikipedia version to the community at large.

{{Academic-written review
| wikidate = date (year) of update by review article author
| journal  = name of journal (can include wikilink)
| title    = 
| author  = 
| date     = publication date of corresponding review
| volume   = 
| issue    =  
| pages    = 
| pmid     = pmid number
| doi      = identifier only
| pmc      = pmc id without the leading 'PMC'
| url      = url to open access page if available

Example with QID

{{Academic-written review|Q = Q38916407}}


Example without QID

{{Academic-written review
| wikidate = 2016
| journal  = [[Gene (journal)|Gene]]
| title    = {{#property:P1476|from=Q38916407}}
| author  = {{#property:P2093|from=Q38916407}}
| date     = {{#property:P577|from=Q38916407}}
| volume   = {{#property:P478|from=Q38916407}}
| issue    = {{#property:P433|from=Q38916407}}
| pages    = {{#property:P304|from=Q38916407}}
| doi      = {{#property:P356|from=Q38916407}}
| pmid     = {{#property:P698|from=Q38916407}}
| pmc      = {{#property:P932|from=Q38916407}}



Note that this template transcludes the Cite Journal Template, and inherits one of the weaknesses/issues of said template. The author list must be formatted in a certain way or it will give errors when using the {{{vauthors}}} parameter. If you use this template and populate it with info pulled from Wikidata, it will not format the author list in a way compatible with {{{vauthors}}}. Rather than have each use of the template raise an error, this template uses the {{{authors}}} instead. Unfortunately, the use of this parameter is discouraged because it does not contribute to a citation's metadata, and users consuming cs1|2 citations via the metadata will find that the citation is missing authors.

Categories for pages using these templates

See also

  • {{Academic peer reviewed}} - a similar template for articles, where content has been published in a peer reviewed journal
  • {{External peer review}} - a similar template for articles reviewed externally but not full academic peer review