User talk:Forte
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leftypedia is not a soapbox
Get out of here, revisionist! Self-promotion of your propaganda outlet is not allowed! Wisconcom (talk) 00:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would say the same. Stop lying about our project in your personal vendetta. You were banned because you are an abusive human being, having stalked our editors and sent us multiple e-mails everyday for weeks. The things you've done can be considered a criminal offense, and I've been contacting regional authorities on this. --Forte (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize, but I just think you have a clear motive here. Please write article from a prospective which is not biased towards your project. Thank you. Wisconcom (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The article you've single-handledly wrote is not only biased against our project, but filled with lies, slanders and entirely fabricated statements, such as claiming the administration created spam bots to justify vetting? If you're not aware, MediaWiki software is a common target of spam. Leftypedia itself fell under spam attacks since early 2021, similar to the spam attacks on ProleWiki. You used a post on social media where these spam attacks were described to claim these bots were "created" by the administration. The entire article is full of fabricated lies such as these --Forte (talk) 01:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry if you feel these statements are incorrect. Please discuss them on the talk pages if you feel they do not represent the history of your project correctly. Wisconcom (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Stop acting like Trotsky and do something productive with your life. You've been entering several websites just to soap box lies against us, while you have accomplished nothing. You accuse us of doing exactly the same thing as you. You don't care about communism, Marxism, the left, social movements and revolution, all you care about since October last year is to trash and infiltrate us, sabotage us and slander us just like Trotsky. --Forte (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is not related to this site. Please be neutral when documenting your project. Thank you. Wisconcom (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I removed the lies you told about our project using articles you've written yourself as source. I also preserved the critique you made that we don't document the exploitation of workers in modern socialist countries, which is actually reasonable and I agree. Despite of your claims that we are a "Dengist echo chamber" single-handledly controlled by me, I've actually contributed to critiques of China's policies on Xinjiang and the corporatist structure and bourgeois influence in the only trade union of the country, the ACFTU. --Forte (talk) 01:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- "Please be neutral when documenting the project"? You mean like how you insulted me in the changelog for everyone to see and later told me to "go fornicate myself" in the talk page? --CriticalResist (talk) 08:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is not related to this site. Please be neutral when documenting your project. Thank you. Wisconcom (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Stop acting like Trotsky and do something productive with your life. You've been entering several websites just to soap box lies against us, while you have accomplished nothing. You accuse us of doing exactly the same thing as you. You don't care about communism, Marxism, the left, social movements and revolution, all you care about since October last year is to trash and infiltrate us, sabotage us and slander us just like Trotsky. --Forte (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry if you feel these statements are incorrect. Please discuss them on the talk pages if you feel they do not represent the history of your project correctly. Wisconcom (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The article you've single-handledly wrote is not only biased against our project, but filled with lies, slanders and entirely fabricated statements, such as claiming the administration created spam bots to justify vetting? If you're not aware, MediaWiki software is a common target of spam. Leftypedia itself fell under spam attacks since early 2021, similar to the spam attacks on ProleWiki. You used a post on social media where these spam attacks were described to claim these bots were "created" by the administration. The entire article is full of fabricated lies such as these --Forte (talk) 01:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize, but I just think you have a clear motive here. Please write article from a prospective which is not biased towards your project. Thank you. Wisconcom (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Self-promotional editing
Hello, Forte. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Leftypedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Leftypedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Leftypedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Leftypedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Leftypedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.