User talk:Forte: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::The article you've single-handledly wrote is not only biased against our project, but filled with lies, slanders and entirely fabricated statements, such as claiming the administration created spam bots to justify vetting? If you're not aware, [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Combating_spam MediaWiki software is a common target of spam]. Leftypedia itself fell [https://web.archive.org/web/20210120195031/https://leftypedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges under spam attacks since early 2021], similar to the spam attacks on ProleWiki. You used a [https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9176 post on social media] where these spam attacks were described to claim these bots were "created" by the administration. The entire article is full of fabricated lies such as these --[[User:Forte|Forte]] ([[User talk:Forte|talk]]) 01:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | :::The article you've single-handledly wrote is not only biased against our project, but filled with lies, slanders and entirely fabricated statements, such as claiming the administration created spam bots to justify vetting? If you're not aware, [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Combating_spam MediaWiki software is a common target of spam]. Leftypedia itself fell [https://web.archive.org/web/20210120195031/https://leftypedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges under spam attacks since early 2021], similar to the spam attacks on ProleWiki. You used a [https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9176 post on social media] where these spam attacks were described to claim these bots were "created" by the administration. The entire article is full of fabricated lies such as these --[[User:Forte|Forte]] ([[User talk:Forte|talk]]) 01:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::I am sorry if you feel these statements are incorrect. Please discuss them on the talk pages if you feel they do not represent the history of your project correctly. [[User:Wisconcom|Wisconcom]] ([[User talk:Wisconcom|talk]]) 01:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | ::::I am sorry if you feel these statements are incorrect. Please discuss them on the talk pages if you feel they do not represent the history of your project correctly. [[User:Wisconcom|Wisconcom]] ([[User talk:Wisconcom|talk]]) 01:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::Stop acting like Trotsky and do something productive with your life. You've been entering several websites just to soap box lies against us, while you have accomplished nothing. You accuse us of doing exactly the same thing as you. You don't care about communism, Marxism, the left, social movements and revolution, all you care about since October last year is to trash and infiltrate us, sabotage us and slander us just like Trotsky. --[[User:Forte|Forte]] ([[User talk:Forte|talk]]) 01:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:28, 30 January 2023
Leftypedia is not a soapbox
Get out of here, revisionist! Self-promotion of your propaganda outlet is not allowed! Wisconcom (talk) 00:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would say the same. Stop lying about our project in your personal vendetta. You were banned because you are an abusive human being, having stalked our editors and sent us multiple e-mails everyday for weeks. The things you've done can be considered a criminal offense, and I've been contacting regional authorities on this. --Forte (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize, but I just think you have a clear motive here. Please write article from a prospective which is not biased towards your project. Thank you. Wisconcom (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The article you've single-handledly wrote is not only biased against our project, but filled with lies, slanders and entirely fabricated statements, such as claiming the administration created spam bots to justify vetting? If you're not aware, MediaWiki software is a common target of spam. Leftypedia itself fell under spam attacks since early 2021, similar to the spam attacks on ProleWiki. You used a post on social media where these spam attacks were described to claim these bots were "created" by the administration. The entire article is full of fabricated lies such as these --Forte (talk) 01:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry if you feel these statements are incorrect. Please discuss them on the talk pages if you feel they do not represent the history of your project correctly. Wisconcom (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Stop acting like Trotsky and do something productive with your life. You've been entering several websites just to soap box lies against us, while you have accomplished nothing. You accuse us of doing exactly the same thing as you. You don't care about communism, Marxism, the left, social movements and revolution, all you care about since October last year is to trash and infiltrate us, sabotage us and slander us just like Trotsky. --Forte (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry if you feel these statements are incorrect. Please discuss them on the talk pages if you feel they do not represent the history of your project correctly. Wisconcom (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The article you've single-handledly wrote is not only biased against our project, but filled with lies, slanders and entirely fabricated statements, such as claiming the administration created spam bots to justify vetting? If you're not aware, MediaWiki software is a common target of spam. Leftypedia itself fell under spam attacks since early 2021, similar to the spam attacks on ProleWiki. You used a post on social media where these spam attacks were described to claim these bots were "created" by the administration. The entire article is full of fabricated lies such as these --Forte (talk) 01:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize, but I just think you have a clear motive here. Please write article from a prospective which is not biased towards your project. Thank you. Wisconcom (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)