Search results

* [[WP:NPOV|Neutral point of view policy]] * [[WP:DR|Dispute resolution process]]

...de> at the top of the disputed article, then explain your reasons on the [[WP:TP|talk page]] of the disputed article. * [[WP:NPOV|Neutral point of view policy]]

* There is currently no consensus on where to place this template in an article, though the bottom of the art * This [[WP:TM|template]] is a [[WP:SELF|self-reference]].

...n. If a consensus is reached that the information should be included, or [[WP:SILENCE|no one contested the proposal]], the information is inserted in the ...ormation in an article, especially if it's controversial information. If a consensus is reached that the information should be included, or no one contested the

=== Third Phase: From Consensus to Crisis (circa 1945-1970s) === After [[World War II]] a consensus developed around social-democracy and Keynesianism. Paternalistic conservat

|Use this template when you have identified a serious issue regarding [[WP:Neutral point of view]]. ...n the absence of such a discussion, or where it remains unclear what the [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]] violation is, the tag may be removed by any editor.

...sly acceptable citation style that is now [[Deprecation|deprecated]] per [[WP:PARREF]]. ...one acceptable form of inline citations to another without [[WP:Consensus|consensus]], especially for reasons of personal preference or to make one article mat

...s where you have identified a serious issue of balance and the lack of a [[WP:Neutral point of view]] in regards to political parties, politicians, event # There is consensus on the talkpage or the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard|NPOV N

...<year></code>'''. If the date is not included it may be added later by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. ...|there}} from trying to incorrectly link to something like "Talk:Wikipedia:Consensus".

|Use this template when you have identified a serious issue regarding [[WP:Neutral point of view]]. ...n the absence of such a discussion, or where it remains unclear what the [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]] violation is, the tag may be removed by any editor.

...icles which need additional internal links. '''Please note:''' there is no consensus on what constitutes "too few" links. Use editor discretion, and if you disa ...:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages]] – rules on linking applicable to [[WP:Disambiguation|disambiguation]] pages

|Use this template when you have identified a serious issue regarding [[WP:Neutral point of view]]. ...n the absence of such a discussion, or where it remains unclear what the [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]] violation is, the tag may be removed by any editor.

...or {{tlx|more citations needed}}, but also indicates that an editor has [[WP:BEFORE|searched for reliable sources on the topic]] and determined that suf ...fter hatnotes, at the start of the article. That placement is supported by consensus obtained in an RfC at {{section link|Template talk:More citations needed/Ar

| title = Templates for [[WP:Proposed mergers|Proposed article mergers]] ...d}} <small>(Post PAM merge needed; for source page but unclear destination consensus)</small>

Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy requires that we don't give [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] to any particular subtopic in an article. For example, # There is consensus on the talkpage or the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard|NPOV N

* There is currently no consensus on where in the article to place templates such as this. The presence of [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] in an article doesn't mean the article must be ta

* [[Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts|Consensus]] * [[Help:WP search protocol|WP search protocol]]

...ources.3F|self-sourcing example]] in popular culture, according to current consensus by discussion on [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability|WT:V]], is an example that ...fter hatnotes, at the start of the article. That placement is supported by consensus obtained in an RfC at {{section link|Template talk:More citations needed|Rf

This template should only be put on articles which meet the [[WP:Orphan#Criteria|orphan criteria]]. ...emplate. Do not add this template to articles that you honestly believe [[WP:CANTDEORPHAN|will be impossible to de-orphan]].

| imageright = {{shortcut|WP:SHORT}} ...this page, please ensure that your revision reflects [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. When in doubt, discuss on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]].