Russian Federation: Difference between revisions

From Leftypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision imported)
m (Removed campist propaganda)
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
Line 13: Line 13:


====Anti-Soviet Myths====
====Anti-Soviet Myths====
==Accusations of Imperialism==
Regardless of the fact that Russia has a reactionary government with a revanchist foreign poicy, it itself is not [[imperialist]] in the economic sense as the [[United States]] or the [[United Kingdom]] are.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite web|title=The Myth of “Russian Imperialism”: in defence of Lenin’s analyses|url=https://links.org.au/node/4629}}</ref> The Russian bourgeoisie does not conduct foreign policy out of the goodness of its heart, but acting as if Americans need to be on guard against Russia "undermining the USA" is silly. Russia has been the recipient of a steady series of attempts at undermining and isolation on the part of the US, whereas there isn't really anything of the sort that Russia does against the United States. As for the accusations that Russia is conducting imperialism by hijacking the “democracies” of other countries, such as the United States, they are simply false. [[Donald Trump]], for one, has been accused of being a Russia-affiliated agent however acts greatly against the interest of Russia, largely by supporting its opponents in such instances as the $110 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia, support for the re-militarization of Japan, the destabilization of Venezuela, continued and developing support for Israel, or flat out coming to NATO’s defense when Russia is considered to have been making “aggressive” moves against it. If he were a Russian agent, he certainly is doing rather poorly, and this goes for any other Western nation accused of being victims to Russia’s “imperialism”. The inverse is, however, true, as the United States has in fact been quite heavily involved in regime change in Russia, particularly when it first emerged as a republic after the fall of the Soviet Union, when American agents helped get Yeltsin in power despite it being against the will of the people and, especially considering how his term went, against the well-being of the country.


==Relations==
==Relations==
Line 35: Line 32:
[[Category:Christianity]]
[[Category:Christianity]]
[[Category:Russia]]
[[Category:Russia]]
<references />

Revision as of 15:28, 26 February 2023

The Russian Federation is a capitalist state in Eastern Europe. Though it is legally a successor to the Soviet Union, inheriting its embassies and permanent seat on the UN Security Council, it has lost not only its form of government but also its strength, both external and internal. Many of its citizens are addicted to heroin, methamphetamine, and other drugs, contributing also to its HIV problem. With 0.8-1.0% of its population infected with the virus, Russia has one of the worst HIV epidemics outside Africa, enabled by its stagnant and corrupt economy and further reinforced by its brand of traditionalism which opposes sex education in schools as well as its drug policy which has banned methadone; an opioid medication that could lower intravenous drug use and thus help curb the epidemic.[1] Besides this Russia does poorly in many other areas, especially for a European country, having high rates of violent crime, poverty, inequality, corruption, abortion, and orphanage, with the last two influenced by misdiagnoses in prenatal screenings as well as doctors urging mothers to not burden themselves with allegedly afflicted children.[2] Russia has other social ills like prevalent domestic abuse and marital rape, which are considered misdemeanors at most — another manifestation of Russia's particular traditionalist ethos.

Ideology

The Russian Federation is an avowedly capitalist government, led by an anti-communist party. It emerged as part of the counter-revolution against socialism in the USSR, led by Boris Yeltsin. Vladimir Putin, Russia's current President, has said in a 1991 interview:

I must tell you that there was a time in my life when I was very interested in Marxism and Leninism, read a lot about it, found it interesting and often logical. But as I matured, the truth became more and more apparent to me, that all of that was no more then a beautiful but dangerous fairy tale, dangerous because an attempt of its implementation in our country caused a lot of harm. And I would like to talk about the tragedy, which we are experiencing today, the tragedy of disintegration of our state, which you cannot call anything else but tragedy. I think that the actors of October 1917 put a time bomb under the foundation of this building, the building of a unitary state called Russia. They broke our fatherland into separate princedoms [i.e. republics], which never existed of the map of the world. Gave them parliaments and governments, and now we have what we have. On the other hand they destroyed what glues, molds the people of civilized countries – market relationships. They destroyed the market, emerging capitalism.

When asked about these remarks in a 2002 interview, he replied, "I am ready to repeat every word." It should thusly be obvious that Putin is a bourgeois nationalist and an anti-communist. It is probable too that Putin lies about historical events pertaining to socialism, or that he is simply uninformed. For instance, he labeled the Katyn Massacre as a Soviet crime without bothering to explain why it happened; as an action against Polish counter-revolutionaries. This appears to be a tactic he uses frequently — looking good for “apologizing” for the questionable things Russia has been involved in the past, but at the same time acting as if the government at that time is separate from the one he leads, which is contradictory, then, because he apologizes for actions that were not those of his country after all.

Anti-Communism

Repression

According to Blackshirts and Reds, the Yeltsin regime—which helped impose neoliberalism on Russia[3]—forcibly dissolved the Russian parliament along with the Federation’s every other elected representative body, including both municipal and regional councils. They discontinued Russia’s Constitutional Court and launched an armed assault upon the parliament, executing hundreds resisters and demonstrators.[4] (Thousands more were jailed sans charges or trials, and hundreds of elected officials were placed under investigation.) The neoliberal bourgeoisie’s Omon troops repeatedly assaulted leftist demonstrators and pickets in Moscow as well as other Russian cities.[5] Parliamentary deputy Andrei Aidzerdzis (an Independent) and deputy Valentin Martemyanov (a Communist), who both vigorously opposed the neoliberal state, became victims of political homicides, as did the journalist Dmitri Kholodov,[6] whom somebody killed in 1994 for probing corruption in ‘high places’. Further information.[7]

Anti-Soviet Myths

Relations

There are a couple of countries whose citizens are particularly at odds with Russia, particularly those of Poland, the Baltic states, and Finland. Russia has a pre-Soviet history of subjugating those lands and treating their people poorly, even trying to wipe out their culture, language, and otherwise nationhood. In the Soviet era, the USSR was compelled by geographic interests to put these areas under its hegemony again, ultimately in order to combat Nazi Germany or the Western Bloc, even though these nations had become independent from Russia following the Russian Civil War. Although some people there are alright with socialism and the USSR, the populace overall is opposed to these things.

Europeans as a whole have a rather ambivalent relation with Russia. For one, Russia is considered as an aggressor, and its government doesn't give the bourgeoisie as many rights to the country's resources as they would like, however Russia and the rest of Europe do cooperate quite a bit in organizations such as the Council of the Baltic Sea States and through economic projects such as the Nord Stream 1 and 2 natural gas pipelines. However, the United States still considers Russia to be one of its rivals, and so for instance threatened sanctions against Germany in an attempt to stop the Nord Stream 2 project,[8] so as to weaken Russia's economy and retain American dominance of Europe. Many Russian oligarchs and politicians are very much involved in Europe, holding dual citizenship in, owning houses in, and buying products from the European Union. Many of their wives and children also live in the EU. Putin himself leans to the EU economically, seeking to export resources to it and import technology and machinery. Allegedly, his daughters live in the EU as well. He also, like many other affluent Russians, stores money in Swiss banks, and possibly in London too. The EU generally opposes Russian entry into the union, however, because it would displace the other powers in representation due to its large population. The argument that Russia can't join the EU because of its culture or lack of development, relatively, is not a very good one, since the Eastern European EU countries are about as conservative and "undeveloped" as Russia, yet are of course members.

Organizations like the Atlantic Bridge promote American and British dominance in Europe over that of Russia's, however their practical influence is little given the lack of feasibility for their projects, such as shipping fracking gas from the US to Europe in order to push out Russia. Again however, this is economically unviable. Ukraine and Poland likewise have been paid for having the Nord Stream 1 pipeline go through their territory, however oppose the Nord Stream 2 pipeline because that one won't. Other capitalists, who have over-invested in terminals for fracking gas, possibly because of state and EU subsidies, are hostile to Russia because they want their investments to pay off, which means there would have to be a lot of fracking gas coming in to satisfy the European energy market and not Russian gas. It has been speculated that fracking has even been developed largely as a means to undermine the geopolitical power of countries like Russia, on top of others like Venezuela and Iran.

Sometimes western politicians lash out at Russia because of some inadequacy which Russia actually has little to do with. For example, if there are riots, or the "wrong" candidate won, then Russia is sometimes blamed for some kind of interference, but realistically, even if Russia did pay for some advertisements or whatever, it is primarily the fault of the ruling class and politicians of that country which is having trouble.

External links

Discussion with Russian Marxist professor Alexander Buzgalin about Russia

References