Impossibilism: Difference between revisions

From Leftypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (1 revision imported)
m (AWB genfixes and CE)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Stub}}
{{Stub}}


'''Impossibilism''' is a theory on the emergence of [[Socialism|socialism]] and a [[Marxism|Marxist]] perspective that stresses the limited value of political, economic and social reforms within a [[Capitalism|capitalist]] economy.<ref>https://www.thefreedictionary.com/impossibilism</ref> It argues that the pursuit of such reforms is counterproductive because they strengthen support for the existing system, thereby helping to ensure the continuation of capitalism. Impossibilism holds that the pursuit of such reforms should not be a major concern for socialists because they are irrelevant, if not counter-productive, to the goal of realizing socialism.
'''Impossibilism''' is a theory on the emergence of [[socialism]] and a [[Marxism|Marxist]] perspective that stresses the limited value of political, economic and social reforms within a [[Capitalism|capitalist]] economy.<ref>https://www.thefreedictionary.com/impossibilism</ref> It argues that the pursuit of such reforms is counterproductive because they strengthen support for the existing system, thereby helping to ensure the continuation of capitalism. Impossibilism holds that the pursuit of such reforms should not be a major concern for socialists because they are irrelevant, if not counter-productive, to the goal of realizing socialism.


[[Category:Tendencies]]
[[Category:Tendencies]]


== References ==
== References ==
{{Reflist}}

Revision as of 19:23, 21 August 2023

Impossibilism is a theory on the emergence of socialism and a Marxist perspective that stresses the limited value of political, economic and social reforms within a capitalist economy.[1] It argues that the pursuit of such reforms is counterproductive because they strengthen support for the existing system, thereby helping to ensure the continuation of capitalism. Impossibilism holds that the pursuit of such reforms should not be a major concern for socialists because they are irrelevant, if not counter-productive, to the goal of realizing socialism.

References