Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Harrystein (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by a hidden user to last revision by Harrystein) Tags: Removed redirect Rollback |
RedParabola (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
The work [[Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism]] by [[V. I. Lenin]] is responsible for the idea that the imperial epoch is the highest stage of capitalism's development, and therefore that capitalism has not developed since the development of imperialism but is stagnating. This idea is still repeated today but is not synonymous with Lenin's analysis from the early 20th century. | The work [[Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism|''Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism'']] by [[V. I. Lenin]] is responsible for the idea that the imperial epoch is the highest stage of capitalism's development, and therefore that capitalism has not developed since the development of imperialism but is stagnating. This idea is still repeated today but is not synonymous with Lenin's analysis from the early 20th century. | ||
[[category:marxism-Leninism]] | [[category:marxism-Leninism]] | ||
[[category:economics]] | [[category:economics]] | ||
[[category:imperialism]] | [[category:imperialism]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:39, 23 March 2024
The work Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism by V. I. Lenin is responsible for the idea that the imperial epoch is the highest stage of capitalism's development, and therefore that capitalism has not developed since the development of imperialism but is stagnating. This idea is still repeated today but is not synonymous with Lenin's analysis from the early 20th century.