Equivalent form: Difference between revisions
import>CyberSynGang m (1 revision imported: Imported from Marxistpedia) |
Harrystein (talk | contribs) m (CE blockquote) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Distinguishing characteristics == | == Distinguishing characteristics == | ||
Marx outlines four "peculiarities" | Marx outlines four "peculiarities" (''Eigentümlichkeiten'') of the equivalent form, namely: | ||
*that "[[use-value]] becomes the form of manifestation, the phenomenal form of its opposite, [[value]]", | *that "[[use-value]] becomes the form of manifestation, the phenomenal form of its opposite, [[value]]", | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Quote == | == Quote == | ||
{{quote|We have seen that commodity A (the linen), by expressing its value in the use value of a commodity differing in kind (the coat), at the same time impresses upon the latter a specific form of value, namely that of the equivalent. The commodity linen manifests its quality of having a value by the fact that the coat, without having assumed a value form different from its bodily form, is equated to the linen. The fact that the latter therefore has a value is expressed by saying that the coat is directly exchangeable with it. Therefore, when we say that a commodity is in the equivalent form, we express the fact that it is directly exchangeable with other commodities.|Karl Marx|[[Capital Volume I]]|Chapter 1, Section 3}} | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
[[category:marxist economic concepts]] | |||
{{NavPoAV1}} | {{NavPoAV1}} |
Latest revision as of 22:10, 18 April 2023
Things can be exchanged on the market because they are always related to a third thing, abstract human labour, which functions as the equivalent form of the commodity.
Distinguishing characteristics
Marx outlines four "peculiarities" (Eigentümlichkeiten) of the equivalent form, namely:
- that "that concrete labour becomes the form under which its opposite, abstract human labour, manifests itself,"
- that "the labour of private individuals takes the form of its opposite, labour directly social in its form", and
- that "the fetishism of the commodity-form is more striking in the equivalent form than in the relative value-form "
Quote
We have seen that commodity A (the linen), by expressing its value in the use value of a commodity differing in kind (the coat), at the same time impresses upon the latter a specific form of value, namely that of the equivalent. The commodity linen manifests its quality of having a value by the fact that the coat, without having assumed a value form different from its bodily form, is equated to the linen. The fact that the latter therefore has a value is expressed by saying that the coat is directly exchangeable with it. Therefore, when we say that a commodity is in the equivalent form, we express the fact that it is directly exchangeable with other commodities.
— Karl Marx, Capital Volume I, Chapter 1, Section 3