Template:Over-coverage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
default>Spicy (Reverted 1 edit by Dawn PScLim (talk): Unnecessary and ungrammatical) |
m (1 revision imported) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 20:56, 15 August 2022
 | The examples and perspective in this article or section might have an extensive bias or disproportional coverage towards one or more specific regions. (June 2024) |
Template documentation| File:Police man Twinkle Head.svg | If you plan to make breaking changes to this template, move it, or nominate it for deletion, please notify Twinkle's users and maintainers at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle as a courtesy, as this template is used in the standard installation of Twinkle. Thank you! |
Usage
{{Over coverage|date=June 2024}}{{Over coverage|region=REGION}}{{Over coverage|region=REGION|part=PART}}
For example, if there is too much bias or disproportional coverage towards a particular place, such as the U.S. state of California, editors will write {{Over coverage|region=the state of California}}, therefore giving...
| The examples and perspective in this article or section might have an extensive bias or disproportional coverage towards the state of California. (June 2024) |
If a part of the article is biased, {{Over coverage|region=the state of California|part=article's section named "Attacks"}} would be used.
| The examples and perspective in this article's section named "Attacks" might have an extensive bias or disproportional coverage towards the state of California. (June 2024) |
Articles tagged will be placed in Category:Articles with disproportional geographic scope, or a dated subcategory thereof.
See also
- {{Globalize}}
- {{Geographical imbalance}}